 | | 
02-08-2010, 09:55 AM
|  | the breath before a kiss Member #20424 | | Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 418
Thanks: 9
Thanked 53 Times in 44 Posts
Rep Power: 6 | | | The truth about civil rights "The Republican Party was not so badly split as the Democrats by the civil rights issue. Only one Republican senator participated in the filibuster against the bill. In fact, since 1933, Republicans had a more positive record on civil rights than the Democrats. In the twenty-six major civil rights votes since 1933, a majority of Democrats opposed civil rights legislation in over 80 % of the votes. By contrast, the Republican majority favored civil rights in over 96 % of the votes." http://www.congresslink.org/print_ba...ghts64text.htm
__________________ "you spin my head right round right round when you go down when you go down"~ | | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Misty For This Useful Post: | | 
02-08-2010, 11:03 AM
|  | Back by Popular Demand Member #20112 | | Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 6,895
Thanks: 251
Thanked 502 Times in 401 Posts
Rep Power: 67 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Misty "The Republican Party was not so badly split as the Democrats by the civil rights issue. Only one Republican senator participated in the filibuster against the bill. In fact, since 1933, Republicans had a more positive record on civil rights than the Democrats. In the twenty-six major civil rights votes since 1933, a majority of Democrats opposed civil rights legislation in over 80 % of the votes. By contrast, the Republican majority favored civil rights in over 96 % of the votes." CongressLink: [Congress: The Basics - Lawmaking] Civil Rights: Major Features of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 And when a Democrat President signed the Civil Rights Bill...Southern Democrats abandoned their party in droves. Nixon and the RNC membership welcomed them with open arms. | 
02-08-2010, 11:55 AM
|  | Registered User Member #5176 | | Join Date: May 2007 Location: North Carolina
Posts: 19,215
Thanks: 30
Thanked 927 Times in 622 Posts
Rep Power: 260 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by bodecea
Quote: Originally Posted by Misty "The Republican Party was not so badly split as the Democrats by the civil rights issue. Only one Republican senator participated in the filibuster against the bill. In fact, since 1933, Republicans had a more positive record on civil rights than the Democrats. In the twenty-six major civil rights votes since 1933, a majority of Democrats opposed civil rights legislation in over 80 % of the votes. By contrast, the Republican majority favored civil rights in over 96 % of the votes." CongressLink: [Congress: The Basics - Lawmaking] Civil Rights: Major Features of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 And when a Democrat President signed the Civil Rights Bill...Southern Democrats abandoned their party in droves. Nixon and the RNC membership welcomed them with open arms. Once again explain the logic in why a racist would leave a party that only supported the Civil Rights bill by 60 percent for a party that supported the same bill by 80 percent?
__________________ The fact that an opinion has been widely held is no evidence whatever that it is not utterly absurd. Indeed in view of the silliness of the majority of mankind, a widespread belief is more likely to be foolish than sensible.
-Bertrand Russell
Facts are stubborn things, but statistics are more pliable
-Laurence J. Peters
I never said that you had no right to have an opinion. I just said that it was, in fact, worth nothing.
-Maineman ( on 12 June 2007) | 
02-08-2010, 12:56 PM
|  | Back by Popular Demand Member #20112 | | Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 6,895
Thanks: 251
Thanked 502 Times in 401 Posts
Rep Power: 67 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by RetiredGySgt
Quote: Originally Posted by bodecea
Quote: Originally Posted by Misty "The Republican Party was not so badly split as the Democrats by the civil rights issue. Only one Republican senator participated in the filibuster against the bill. In fact, since 1933, Republicans had a more positive record on civil rights than the Democrats. In the twenty-six major civil rights votes since 1933, a majority of Democrats opposed civil rights legislation in over 80 % of the votes. By contrast, the Republican majority favored civil rights in over 96 % of the votes." CongressLink: [Congress: The Basics - Lawmaking] Civil Rights: Major Features of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 And when a Democrat President signed the Civil Rights Bill...Southern Democrats abandoned their party in droves. Nixon and the RNC membership welcomed them with open arms. Once again explain the logic in why a racist would leave a party that only supported the Civil Rights bill by 60 percent for a party that supported the same bill by 80 percent? That is easily explained when one notices the location of said members who abandoned the Democrats and how many Republicans there were in the South prior to the Civil Rights bill.
Coupled with the concerted effort by the RNC and Richard Nixon to cultivate such Dixiecrats by the time 1968 rolled around.
But you knew this already....it's just a statistical flim flam attempt by the OP. And a RNC talking point. | 
02-08-2010, 07:04 PM
|  | when the going gets weird Member #20452 | | Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: where they paint murals of biggie
Posts: 1,514
Thanks: 112
Thanked 155 Times in 120 Posts
Rep Power: 18 | | This is my favorite talking point! Not really.
It's really disengenious to try to make this into a partisan issue - it's a regional issue. The south voted against civil rights, across party lines. The north voted for civil rights, across party lines. Then, when a northern Democrat signed it into law, all the southern Democrats jumped parties. This is why the south to this day is more Republican.
Look up the Southern Strategy.
__________________ Jesus was a Community Organizer
Pilate was a governor “The government of the United States is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion.” - John Adams, 1797 A working class hero is something to be. | 
02-09-2010, 05:47 AM
|  | Supporting Member Member #20321 | | Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: New Jersey
Posts: 7,970
Thanks: 455
Thanked 1,119 Times in 806 Posts
Rep Power: 69 | | | The truth about Civil Rights was that it was not a Democrat/Republican issue it was a North/South issue. Since the "Solid South" was mostly Democrat there were more Democrats opposed. Southern Republicans also opposed Civil rights.
The truth also is that once Democratic President LBJ signed the legislation, Souther Democrats became todays Red State Republicans
And thats the truth
__________________ After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says WTF | 
02-09-2010, 06:34 AM
|  | Back by Popular Demand Member #20112 | | Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 6,895
Thanks: 251
Thanked 502 Times in 401 Posts
Rep Power: 67 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by rightwinger The truth about Civil Rights was that it was not a Democrat/Republican issue it was a North/South issue. Since the "Solid South" was mostly Democrat there were more Democrats opposed. Southern Republicans also opposed Civil rights.
The truth also is that once Democratic President LBJ signed the legislation, Souther Democrats became todays Red State Republicans
And thats the truth Yes it is....but every once in a while, people like the OP and the Clerk will try to slip in their falsehoods, hoping no one is paying attention. | 
02-09-2010, 07:14 AM
|  | Registered User Member #5176 | | Join Date: May 2007 Location: North Carolina
Posts: 19,215
Thanks: 30
Thanked 927 Times in 622 Posts
Rep Power: 260 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by bodecea
Quote: Originally Posted by rightwinger The truth about Civil Rights was that it was not a Democrat/Republican issue it was a North/South issue. Since the "Solid South" was mostly Democrat there were more Democrats opposed. Southern Republicans also opposed Civil rights.
The truth also is that once Democratic President LBJ signed the legislation, Souther Democrats became todays Red State Republicans
And thats the truth Yes it is....but every once in a while, people like the OP and the Clerk will try to slip in their falsehoods, hoping no one is paying attention. Sure thing, we are to believe that racist got mad at their party that barely supported civil rights and joined the party that overwhelmingly supported civil rights. You guys crack me up.
__________________ The fact that an opinion has been widely held is no evidence whatever that it is not utterly absurd. Indeed in view of the silliness of the majority of mankind, a widespread belief is more likely to be foolish than sensible.
-Bertrand Russell
Facts are stubborn things, but statistics are more pliable
-Laurence J. Peters
I never said that you had no right to have an opinion. I just said that it was, in fact, worth nothing.
-Maineman ( on 12 June 2007) | 
02-09-2010, 07:17 AM
|  | Registered User Member #18558 | | Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Georgia
Posts: 430
Thanks: 3
Thanked 82 Times in 61 Posts
Rep Power: 11 | | | My neighbor believes civil rights is when we gave equal rights to blacks.
ONLY.
He is against gays voting much less receiving equal protection under the law.
__________________ fortes fortuna iuvat | 
02-09-2010, 09:02 AM
|  | Back by Popular Demand Member #20112 | | Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 6,895
Thanks: 251
Thanked 502 Times in 401 Posts
Rep Power: 67 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by RetiredGySgt
Quote: Originally Posted by bodecea
Quote: Originally Posted by rightwinger The truth about Civil Rights was that it was not a Democrat/Republican issue it was a North/South issue. Since the "Solid South" was mostly Democrat there were more Democrats opposed. Southern Republicans also opposed Civil rights.
The truth also is that once Democratic President LBJ signed the legislation, Souther Democrats became todays Red State Republicans
And thats the truth Yes it is....but every once in a while, people like the OP and the Clerk will try to slip in their falsehoods, hoping no one is paying attention. Sure thing, we are to believe that racist got mad at their party that barely supported civil rights and joined the party that overwhelmingly supported civil rights. You guys crack me up. The Republicans under Nixon in 1968 overwhelmingly supported Civil Rights? Can you back that up, please? | 
02-09-2010, 09:03 AM
|  | Back by Popular Demand Member #20112 | | Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 6,895
Thanks: 251
Thanked 502 Times in 401 Posts
Rep Power: 67 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by Gadawg73 My neighbor believes civil rights is when we gave equal rights to blacks.
ONLY.
He is against gays voting much less receiving equal protection under the law. Isn't it sad, those people who have such a narrow view of what equal rights/civil rights are all about? (This group....but not that group, or that group, or that group) | 
02-09-2010, 09:08 AM
|  | Back by Popular Demand Member #20112 | | Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 6,895
Thanks: 251
Thanked 502 Times in 401 Posts
Rep Power: 67 | | | | 
02-09-2010, 11:38 AM
|  | the breath before a kiss Member #20424 | | Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 418
Thanks: 9
Thanked 53 Times in 44 Posts
Rep Power: 6 | |
Quote: Originally Posted by bodecea From 1948 to 1984 the Southern states, traditionally a stronghold for the Democrats, became key swing states, providing the popular vote margins in the 1960, 1968 and 1976 elections. During this era, several Republican candidates expressed support for states' rights, which some critics claim was a signal of opposition to federal enforcement of civil rights for blacks and intervention on their behalf, including passage of legislation to protect the franchise.[4]
Analysts such as Richard Johnston and Byron Shafer have argued that this phenomenon had more to do with the economics than it had to do with race.
In The End of Southern Exceptionalism, political scientists Johnston of the University of Pennsylvania and Shafer of the University of Wisconsin wrote that the Republicans' gains in the South corresponded to the growth of the upper middle class in that region.
They suggested that such individuals believed their economic interests were better served by the Republicans than the Democrats. According to Johnston and Shafer, working-class white voters in the South continued to vote for Democrats for national office until the 1990s. In summary, Shafer told The New York Times, "[whites] voted by their economic preferences, not racial preferences".
From wiki.
__________________ "you spin my head right round right round when you go down when you go down"~ | 
02-09-2010, 11:42 AM
|  | the breath before a kiss Member #20424 | | Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 418
Thanks: 9
Thanked 53 Times in 44 Posts
Rep Power: 6 | | | Most Dixiecrats went back to being democrats
The gain of republican power in the south had little to do with race
Young southerners and northerners who moved south are responsible for the rise in republican popularity because of economics not race
__________________ "you spin my head right round right round when you go down when you go down"~ | | The Following User Says Thank You to Misty For This Useful Post: | | 
02-09-2010, 11:53 AM
|  | the breath before a kiss Member #20424 | | Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 418
Thanks: 9
Thanked 53 Times in 44 Posts
Rep Power: 6 | | http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/10/ma...ion2b.t-4.html
"Everyone knows that race has long played a decisive role in Southern electoral politics. From the end of Reconstruction until the beginning of the civil rights era, the story goes, the national Democratic Party made room for segregationist members — and as a result dominated the South. But in the 50s and 60s, Democrats embraced the civil rights movement, costing them the white Southern vote. Meanwhile, the Republican Party successfully wooed disaffected white racists with a “Southern strategy” that championed “states’ rights.”
It’s an easy story to believe, but this year two political scientists called it into question. In their book “The End of Southern Exceptionalism,” Richard Johnston of the University of Pennsylvania and Byron Shafer of the University of Wisconsin argue that the shift in the South from Democratic to Republican was overwhelmingly a question not of race but of economic growth.
In the postwar era, they note, the South transformed itself from a backward region to an engine of the national economy, giving rise to a sizable new wealthy suburban class.
This class, not surprisingly, began to vote for the party that best represented its economic interests: the G.O.P. Working-class whites, however — and here’s the surprise — even those in areas with large black populations, stayed loyal to the Democrats. (This was true until the 90s, when the nation as a whole turned rightward in Congressional voting.)
__________________ "you spin my head right round right round when you go down when you go down"~
Last edited by Misty; 02-09-2010 at 11:56 AM.
| | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Misty For This Useful Post: | |  | |
Lower Navigation
| | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | » Site Navigation | | | » Apple iPad Forum | | | |