US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

DoJ lied about political interference in the New Black Panther Party dismissal?

This is a discussion on DoJ lied about political interference in the New Black Panther Party dismissal? within the Clean Debate Zone forums, part of the US Discussion category; Now for some under the radar news this week. Apparently, the operative word being apparently, Perez, he of the 'disparate impact' fame, ala the settlement ...


Go Back   US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum > US Discussion > Clean Debate Zone

Clean Debate Zone The Clean Debate Zone is to be used for the clean debating of Government Policies, Candidates, Current News and Events ONLY. No personal attacks, name calling, flaming etc is allowed in this section.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-31-2012, 09:49 AM
Trajan's Avatar
conscientia mille testes
Member #23905
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: The Bay Area Soviet
Posts: 28,923
Thanks: 5,740
Thanked 8,518 Times in 5,910 Posts
Mentioned: 241 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 9186
Trajan has disabled reputation
DoJ lied about political interference in the New Black Panther Party dismissal?

Now for some under the radar news this week.


Apparently, the operative word being apparently, Perez, he of the 'disparate impact' fame, ala the settlement with Well Fargo etc. did in fact confer with the career lawyers and it was his 'view' that wound up as the final decision.

Sounds like Perjury to me........You?

....*shrugs*

as 2 accomplished presidents can attest- its not the crime in the end that gets you, its the cover up.


snip--

Obama’s DOJ had claimed Judicial Watch was not entitled to attorney’s fees since “none of the records produced in this litigation evidenced any political interference whatsoever in” how the DOJ handled the New Black Panther Party case. But United States District Court Judge Reggie Walton disagreed. Citing a “series of emails” between Obama political appointees and career Justice lawyers, Walton writes:

The documents reveal that political appointees within DOJ were conferring about the status and resolution of the New Black Panther Party case in the days preceding the DOJ’s dismissal of claims in that case, which would appear to contradict Assistant Attorney General Perez’s testimony that political leadership was not involved in that decision. Surely the public has an interest in documents that cast doubt on the accuracy of government officials’ representations regarding the possible politicization of agency decision-making.


more at-

Federal Court finds Obama appointees interfered with New Black Panther prosecution | WashingtonExaminer.com
__________________
Naphta to Settembrini;
“It is ultimately a cruel misunderstanding of youth to believe it will find its heart’s desire in freedom, when truly, its deepest desire is to obey.” ( Der Zauberberg)


Barack Obama -Inaugural Address Jan 2009; "As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals. . . . Those ideals still light the world, and we will not give them up for expedience's sake."

Barack Obama- Friday June 2013; "I think it's important to recognize that you can't have 100% security and also then have 100% privacy and zero inconvenience. We're going to have to make some choices as a society."
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Trajan For This Useful Post:
freedombecki (08-01-2012)
Sponsored Links
USMessageBoard.com is the premier Political Forum Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see these ads. Please Register - It's Free!
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 07-31-2012, 09:59 AM
WillowTree's Avatar
European American
Member #11947
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 61,996
Thanks: 7,496
Thanked 12,118 Times in 8,240 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 7356
WillowTree is cooler than the underside of a pillow WillowTree is cooler than the underside of a pillow WillowTree is cooler than the underside of a pillow
WillowTree is cooler than the underside of a pillow WillowTree is cooler than the underside of a pillow WillowTree is cooler than the underside of a pillow WillowTree is cooler than the underside of a pillow WillowTree is cooler than the underside of a pillow WillowTree is cooler than the underside of a pillow WillowTree is cooler than the underside of a pillow WillowTree is cooler than the underside of a pillow WillowTree is cooler than the underside of a pillow WillowTree is cooler than the underside of a pillow
Just don't say Hussein.
__________________
please please please don't throw me in the tittie bar! Originally Posted by Salt Jones
98% of blacks are racist. Why do you think we laughed at all the white people killed on 9/11/01 or as we call it "New Christmas".
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to WillowTree For This Useful Post:
koshergrl (08-01-2012)
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-31-2012, 10:01 AM
Registered User
Member #37101
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 6,887
Thanks: 900
Thanked 2,513 Times in 1,737 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 1401
tjvh could be on the Supreme Court tjvh could be on the Supreme Court
tjvh could be on the Supreme Court tjvh could be on the Supreme Court tjvh could be on the Supreme Court tjvh could be on the Supreme Court tjvh could be on the Supreme Court tjvh could be on the Supreme Court tjvh could be on the Supreme Court tjvh could be on the Supreme Court tjvh could be on the Supreme Court
Quote: Originally Posted by WillowTree View Post
Just don't say Hussein.
How about just Barry Soetoro? Will that suffice?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 07-31-2012, 09:29 PM
eflatminor's Avatar
Classical Liberal
Member #30139
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 8,182
Thanks: 2,391
Thanked 3,270 Times in 2,056 Posts
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 2124
eflatminor has a reputation beyond repute eflatminor has a reputation beyond repute eflatminor has a reputation beyond repute
eflatminor has a reputation beyond repute eflatminor has a reputation beyond repute eflatminor has a reputation beyond repute eflatminor has a reputation beyond repute eflatminor has a reputation beyond repute eflatminor has a reputation beyond repute eflatminor has a reputation beyond repute eflatminor has a reputation beyond repute eflatminor has a reputation beyond repute eflatminor has a reputation beyond repute eflatminor has a reputation beyond repute
Perjury smergery...ain't no way Obama gonna let his pal Holder hang. No way.

I know this sounds crazy, but I wouldn't put it past Obama to claim executive privilege to keep Holder from facing the truth. Crazy, I know...
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 07-31-2012, 09:36 PM
Vidi's Avatar
CDZ prohibited
Member #36201
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 2,875
Thanks: 155
Thanked 574 Times in 441 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 273
Vidi may be on a path to greatness Vidi may be on a path to greatness Vidi may be on a path to greatness Vidi may be on a path to greatness Vidi may be on a path to greatness Vidi may be on a path to greatness Vidi may be on a path to greatness Vidi may be on a path to greatness Vidi may be on a path to greatness Vidi may be on a path to greatness Vidi may be on a path to greatness Vidi may be on a path to greatness
I read the article.

"confering" could mean anything. WE are "confering" that doesnt mean we influenced the decision.

Is there something more substantial?
__________________
I will NOT be your ECHO CHAMBER!!!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2012, 05:04 AM
Ravi's Avatar
Hating hatters
Member #30646
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 59,627
Thanks: 2,012
Thanked 6,322 Times in 4,230 Posts
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 6076
Ravi has disabled reputation
There was never any evidence of voter intimidation. Charges would have been a travesty of justice.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2012, 05:11 AM
JoeB131's Avatar
Eisenhower Republican!
Member #31057
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Chicago, Chicago, that Toddling Town
Posts: 42,797
Thanks: 625
Thanked 9,107 Times in 6,745 Posts
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 4318
JoeB131 has a reputation beyond repute JoeB131 has a reputation beyond repute
JoeB131 has a reputation beyond repute JoeB131 has a reputation beyond repute JoeB131 has a reputation beyond repute JoeB131 has a reputation beyond repute JoeB131 has a reputation beyond repute JoeB131 has a reputation beyond repute JoeB131 has a reputation beyond repute JoeB131 has a reputation beyond repute JoeB131 has a reputation beyond repute JoeB131 has a reputation beyond repute JoeB131 has a reputation beyond repute JoeB131 has a reputation beyond repute JoeB131 has a reputation beyond repute
I think the problem here is prosecutorial discretion.

The argument is that the Bush DOJ, the one that fired people for not making political prosecutions, decided to go after this rather petty incident in its last days, even though the local and state officials didn't consider it that big of a deal.

Police ran these guys off after about five minutes when someone complained about them. So obviously, they really weren't very good at the "voter intimidation" thing.

You ever hear the expression, "Don't make a Federal Case out of it". It means, "Don't make a big deal about something because it isn't that big of a deal."

Here's a case where someone tried to do that literally instead of figuratively.
__________________
In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.
.
- Dwight D. Eisenhower
-
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2012, 06:34 AM
Jackson's Avatar
Pride with no prejudice
Member #27360
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Nashville
Posts: 7,322
Thanks: 1,605
Thanked 2,779 Times in 1,812 Posts
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 5025
Jackson is cooler than the underside of a pillow Jackson is cooler than the underside of a pillow Jackson is cooler than the underside of a pillow
Jackson is cooler than the underside of a pillow Jackson is cooler than the underside of a pillow Jackson is cooler than the underside of a pillow Jackson is cooler than the underside of a pillow Jackson is cooler than the underside of a pillow Jackson is cooler than the underside of a pillow Jackson is cooler than the underside of a pillow Jackson is cooler than the underside of a pillow Jackson is cooler than the underside of a pillow Jackson is cooler than the underside of a pillow Jackson is cooler than the underside of a pillow Jackson is cooler than the underside of a pillow Jackson is cooler than the underside of a pillow Jackson is cooler than the underside of a pillow
Quote: Originally Posted by Trajan View Post
Now for some under the radar news this week.


Apparently, the operative word being apparently, Perez, he of the 'disparate impact' fame, ala the settlement with Well Fargo etc. did in fact confer with the career lawyers and it was his 'view' that wound up as the final decision.

Sounds like Perjury to me........You?

....*shrugs*

as 2 accomplished presidents can attest- its not the crime in the end that gets you, its the cover up.


snip--

Obama’s DOJ had claimed Judicial Watch was not entitled to attorney’s fees since “none of the records produced in this litigation evidenced any political interference whatsoever in” how the DOJ handled the New Black Panther Party case. But United States District Court Judge Reggie Walton disagreed. Citing a “series of emails” between Obama political appointees and career Justice lawyers, Walton writes:

The documents reveal that political appointees within DOJ were conferring about the status and resolution of the New Black Panther Party case in the days preceding the DOJ’s dismissal of claims in that case, which would appear to contradict Assistant Attorney General Perez’s testimony that political leadership was not involved in that decision. Surely the public has an interest in documents that cast doubt on the accuracy of government officials’ representations regarding the possible politicization of agency decision-making.


more at-

Federal Court finds Obama appointees interfered with New Black Panther prosecution | WashingtonExaminer.com
Of course there is a case for pejury. Judge Walton found as much and described it in his decision. This is another case for a special prosecutor in the DOJ and the scandals are adding up!
__________________
"The closest thing to eternal life on this planet is a government program." Ronald Reagan

All posts are my opinion only unless otherwise noted.

Last edited by Jackson; 08-01-2012 at 06:36 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2012, 07:51 AM
R.D.'s Avatar
Bossy
Member #27986
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,339
Thanks: 2,268
Thanked 2,198 Times in 1,368 Posts
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 4382
R.D. has a reputation beyond repute R.D. has a reputation beyond repute
R.D. has a reputation beyond repute R.D. has a reputation beyond repute R.D. has a reputation beyond repute R.D. has a reputation beyond repute R.D. has a reputation beyond repute R.D. has a reputation beyond repute R.D. has a reputation beyond repute R.D. has a reputation beyond repute R.D. has a reputation beyond repute R.D. has a reputation beyond repute R.D. has a reputation beyond repute R.D. has a reputation beyond repute R.D. has a reputation beyond repute R.D. has a reputation beyond repute
Quote: Originally Posted by Ravi View Post
There was never any evidence of voter intimidation. Charges would have been a travesty of justice.
Right, they were just poll workers with billy clubs.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to R.D. For This Useful Post:
freedombecki (08-01-2012)
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2012, 10:58 AM
Trajan's Avatar
conscientia mille testes
Member #23905
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: The Bay Area Soviet
Posts: 28,923
Thanks: 5,740
Thanked 8,518 Times in 5,910 Posts
Mentioned: 241 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 9186
Trajan has disabled reputation
Quote: Originally Posted by Vidi View Post
I read the article.

"confering" could mean anything. WE are "confering" that doesnt mean we influenced the decision.

Is there something more substantial?
quote-

At a hearing before the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights on May 14, 2010, Perez was asked by Commissioner Peter Kirsanow whether “any political leadership [was] involved in the decision not to pursue this particular case.” Perez’s answer, on page 79 of the transcript of that hearing, is an uncategorical “No.” When the statements of Perez are compared to the documents that Judicial Watch forced DOJ to release in the FOIA lawsuit, it is clear Judge Walton was polite when he said they are contradictory and “cast doubt on the accuracy” of Perez’s account.

According to the court, the DOJ documents, including emails from former Associate Attorney General Thomas Perrelli (who was the number-two official at DOJ) and former Democratic election lawyer and Deputy Associate Attorney General Sam Hirsch, “revealed that political appointees within DOJ were conferring about the status and resolution of the New Black Panther Party case in the days preceding the DOJ’s dismissal of claims.”

The PJ Tatler » Federal Court: DOJ Official May Have Lied About the New Black Panther Case


is that more clear and substantial? and just aside from that, what the heck would they be conferring ON or over? the color of the Nationals new uniforms?
__________________
Naphta to Settembrini;
“It is ultimately a cruel misunderstanding of youth to believe it will find its heart’s desire in freedom, when truly, its deepest desire is to obey.” ( Der Zauberberg)


Barack Obama -Inaugural Address Jan 2009; "As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals. . . . Those ideals still light the world, and we will not give them up for expedience's sake."

Barack Obama- Friday June 2013; "I think it's important to recognize that you can't have 100% security and also then have 100% privacy and zero inconvenience. We're going to have to make some choices as a society."
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2012, 11:04 AM
Trajan's Avatar
conscientia mille testes
Member #23905
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: The Bay Area Soviet
Posts: 28,923
Thanks: 5,740
Thanked 8,518 Times in 5,910 Posts
Mentioned: 241 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 9186
Trajan has disabled reputation
Quote: Originally Posted by R.D. View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by Ravi View Post
There was never any evidence of voter intimidation. Charges would have been a travesty of justice.
Right, they were just poll workers with billy clubs.
and of course theres the 'test'.....

would people dressed up in Neo-nazi militia garb in front of a polling places, billy clubs in hand skate in the same fashion?

somehow, I just don't think so.
__________________
Naphta to Settembrini;
“It is ultimately a cruel misunderstanding of youth to believe it will find its heart’s desire in freedom, when truly, its deepest desire is to obey.” ( Der Zauberberg)


Barack Obama -Inaugural Address Jan 2009; "As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals. . . . Those ideals still light the world, and we will not give them up for expedience's sake."

Barack Obama- Friday June 2013; "I think it's important to recognize that you can't have 100% security and also then have 100% privacy and zero inconvenience. We're going to have to make some choices as a society."
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2012, 11:08 AM
iamwhatiseem's Avatar
Registered User
Member #24610
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Indiana
Posts: 9,426
Thanks: 1,630
Thanked 3,957 Times in 2,469 Posts
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 3730
iamwhatiseem has a reputation beyond repute
iamwhatiseem has a reputation beyond repute iamwhatiseem has a reputation beyond repute iamwhatiseem has a reputation beyond repute iamwhatiseem has a reputation beyond repute iamwhatiseem has a reputation beyond repute iamwhatiseem has a reputation beyond repute iamwhatiseem has a reputation beyond repute iamwhatiseem has a reputation beyond repute iamwhatiseem has a reputation beyond repute iamwhatiseem has a reputation beyond repute iamwhatiseem has a reputation beyond repute iamwhatiseem has a reputation beyond repute iamwhatiseem has a reputation beyond repute iamwhatiseem has a reputation beyond repute
Quote: Originally Posted by Vidi View Post
I read the article.

"confering" could mean anything. WE are "confering" that doesnt mean we influenced the decision.

Is there something more substantial?
Do you really need it?
You have heard the expressions - "where this is smoke - there is fire"? or how about "you don't need someone to tell you this stinks...when something smells fishy...you just know it".

Could interference be proved in court? Doubt it.
Do you need the same level of proof to get past common sense? No...you don't.
There were so many laws, SERIOUS laws broke by the black panthers when this happened - that you would have to be a fool or a partisan bat to not see political influence all over this thing.
Had this been the south, had this been white supremacist wearing military-style clothing - shiiit...Obamas camp would have been all over it and the Aryan boys would have been hung by their balls.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2012, 11:13 AM
Moonglow's Avatar
liberal soldier
Member #30820
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: sw mizzouri
Posts: 20,738
Thanks: 1,735
Thanked 3,937 Times in 3,004 Posts
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 2707
Moonglow has a reputation beyond repute Moonglow has a reputation beyond repute Moonglow has a reputation beyond repute Moonglow has a reputation beyond repute
Moonglow has a reputation beyond repute Moonglow has a reputation beyond repute Moonglow has a reputation beyond repute Moonglow has a reputation beyond repute Moonglow has a reputation beyond repute Moonglow has a reputation beyond repute Moonglow has a reputation beyond repute Moonglow has a reputation beyond repute
I saw the evidence presented and did not see how what they did was politically motivated.
I did some intimidation, but i also wondered why the people did not stand up to the men and drive them out, I know they were poll watchers, but still, if it happened in my polling place iIwould never stand for their actions, and I would take immediate action to stop any aggressive behaivor by anyone.
The DOJ under Bush did not prosecute and neither did Obama, but still the video does not show proof of voter intemidation to vote democrat only.
__________________
To live is to suffer~Fritz Lang-Film Director


Love, peace and harmony is sorely lacking in humans around the world.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 08-01-2012, 11:21 AM
iamwhatiseem's Avatar
Registered User
Member #24610
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Indiana
Posts: 9,426
Thanks: 1,630
Thanked 3,957 Times in 2,469 Posts
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Rep Power: 3730
iamwhatiseem has a reputation beyond repute
iamwhatiseem has a reputation beyond repute iamwhatiseem has a reputation beyond repute iamwhatiseem has a reputation beyond repute iamwhatiseem has a reputation beyond repute iamwhatiseem has a reputation beyond repute iamwhatiseem has a reputation beyond repute iamwhatiseem has a reputation beyond repute iamwhatiseem has a reputation beyond repute iamwhatiseem has a reputation beyond repute iamwhatiseem has a reputation beyond repute iamwhatiseem has a reputation beyond repute iamwhatiseem has a reputation beyond repute iamwhatiseem has a reputation beyond repute iamwhatiseem has a reputation beyond repute
Quote: Originally Posted by Moonglow View Post
I saw the evidence presented and did not see how what they did was politically motivated.
I did some intimidation, but i also wondered why the people did not stand up to the men and drive them out, I know they were poll watchers, but still, if it happened in my polling place iIwould never stand for their actions, and I would take immediate action to stop any aggressive behaivor by anyone.
The DOJ under Bush did not prosecute and neither did Obama, but still the video does not show proof of voter intemidation to vote democrat only.

Yeah...large guys walking around in black military-style clothing, combat boots - carrying clubs...naahhh - your right...nothing intimidating about that...hell now.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Lower Navigation
Go Back   US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum > US Discussion > Clean Debate Zone
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:54 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.