![]() | |
This is a discussion on DoJ lied about political interference in the New Black Panther Party dismissal? within the Clean Debate Zone forums, part of the US Discussion category; Now for some under the radar news this week. Apparently, the operative word being apparently, Perez, he of the 'disparate impact' fame, ala the settlement ...
| |||||||
| Clean Debate Zone The Clean Debate Zone is to be used for the clean debating of Government Policies, Candidates, Current News and Events ONLY. No personal attacks, name calling, flaming etc is allowed in this section. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| DoJ lied about political interference in the New Black Panther Party dismissal? Now for some under the radar news this week. Apparently, the operative word being apparently, Perez, he of the 'disparate impact' fame, ala the settlement with Well Fargo etc. did in fact confer with the career lawyers and it was his 'view' that wound up as the final decision. Sounds like Perjury to me........You? ....*shrugs* as 2 accomplished presidents can attest- its not the crime in the end that gets you, its the cover up. snip-- Obama’s DOJ had claimed Judicial Watch was not entitled to attorney’s fees since “none of the records produced in this litigation evidenced any political interference whatsoever in” how the DOJ handled the New Black Panther Party case. But United States District Court Judge Reggie Walton disagreed. Citing a “series of emails” between Obama political appointees and career Justice lawyers, Walton writes: The documents reveal that political appointees within DOJ were conferring about the status and resolution of the New Black Panther Party case in the days preceding the DOJ’s dismissal of claims in that case, which would appear to contradict Assistant Attorney General Perez’s testimony that political leadership was not involved in that decision. Surely the public has an interest in documents that cast doubt on the accuracy of government officials’ representations regarding the possible politicization of agency decision-making. more at- Federal Court finds Obama appointees interfered with New Black Panther prosecution | WashingtonExaminer.com
__________________ Naphta to Settembrini; “It is ultimately a cruel misunderstanding of youth to believe it will find its heart’s desire in freedom, when truly, its deepest desire is to obey.” ( Der Zauberberg) Barack Obama -Inaugural Address Jan 2009; "As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals. . . . Those ideals still light the world, and we will not give them up for expedience's sake." Barack Obama- Friday June 2013; "I think it's important to recognize that you can't have 100% security and also then have 100% privacy and zero inconvenience. We're going to have to make some choices as a society." |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Trajan For This Useful Post: | ||
freedombecki (08-01-2012) | ||
| Sponsored Links |
|
USMessageBoard.com is the premier Political Forum Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see these ads. Please Register - It's Free! |
| The Following User Says Thank You to WillowTree For This Useful Post: | ||
koshergrl (08-01-2012) | ||
| |||
| How about just Barry Soetoro? Will that suffice? |
| ||||
| Perjury smergery...ain't no way Obama gonna let his pal Holder hang. No way. I know this sounds crazy, but I wouldn't put it past Obama to claim executive privilege to keep Holder from facing the truth. Crazy, I know... |
| ||||
| I read the article. "confering" could mean anything. WE are "confering" that doesnt mean we influenced the decision. Is there something more substantial?
__________________ I will NOT be your ECHO CHAMBER!!! |
| ||||
| I think the problem here is prosecutorial discretion. The argument is that the Bush DOJ, the one that fired people for not making political prosecutions, decided to go after this rather petty incident in its last days, even though the local and state officials didn't consider it that big of a deal. Police ran these guys off after about five minutes when someone complained about them. So obviously, they really weren't very good at the "voter intimidation" thing. You ever hear the expression, "Don't make a Federal Case out of it". It means, "Don't make a big deal about something because it isn't that big of a deal." Here's a case where someone tried to do that literally instead of figuratively.
__________________ http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/291227-republicans-rich-vs-rubes.html |
| ||||
| Now for some under the radar news this week. Apparently, the operative word being apparently, Perez, he of the 'disparate impact' fame, ala the settlement with Well Fargo etc. did in fact confer with the career lawyers and it was his 'view' that wound up as the final decision. Sounds like Perjury to me........You? ....*shrugs* as 2 accomplished presidents can attest- its not the crime in the end that gets you, its the cover up. snip-- Obama’s DOJ had claimed Judicial Watch was not entitled to attorney’s fees since “none of the records produced in this litigation evidenced any political interference whatsoever in” how the DOJ handled the New Black Panther Party case. But United States District Court Judge Reggie Walton disagreed. Citing a “series of emails” between Obama political appointees and career Justice lawyers, Walton writes: The documents reveal that political appointees within DOJ were conferring about the status and resolution of the New Black Panther Party case in the days preceding the DOJ’s dismissal of claims in that case, which would appear to contradict Assistant Attorney General Perez’s testimony that political leadership was not involved in that decision. Surely the public has an interest in documents that cast doubt on the accuracy of government officials’ representations regarding the possible politicization of agency decision-making. more at- Federal Court finds Obama appointees interfered with New Black Panther prosecution | WashingtonExaminer.com
__________________ "The closest thing to eternal life on this planet is a government program." Ronald Reagan All posts are my opinion only unless otherwise noted. Last edited by Jackson; 08-01-2012 at 06:36 AM. |
| ||||
| Right, they were just poll workers with billy clubs. |
| The Following User Says Thank You to R.D. For This Useful Post: | ||
freedombecki (08-01-2012) | ||
| ||||
| At a hearing before the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights on May 14, 2010, Perez was asked by Commissioner Peter Kirsanow whether “any political leadership [was] involved in the decision not to pursue this particular case.” Perez’s answer, on page 79 of the transcript of that hearing, is an uncategorical “No.” When the statements of Perez are compared to the documents that Judicial Watch forced DOJ to release in the FOIA lawsuit, it is clear Judge Walton was polite when he said they are contradictory and “cast doubt on the accuracy” of Perez’s account. According to the court, the DOJ documents, including emails from former Associate Attorney General Thomas Perrelli (who was the number-two official at DOJ) and former Democratic election lawyer and Deputy Associate Attorney General Sam Hirsch, “revealed that political appointees within DOJ were conferring about the status and resolution of the New Black Panther Party case in the days preceding the DOJ’s dismissal of claims.” The PJ Tatler » Federal Court: DOJ Official May Have Lied About the New Black Panther Case is that more clear and substantial? and just aside from that, what the heck would they be conferring ON or over? the color of the Nationals new uniforms?
__________________ Naphta to Settembrini; “It is ultimately a cruel misunderstanding of youth to believe it will find its heart’s desire in freedom, when truly, its deepest desire is to obey.” ( Der Zauberberg) Barack Obama -Inaugural Address Jan 2009; "As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals. . . . Those ideals still light the world, and we will not give them up for expedience's sake." Barack Obama- Friday June 2013; "I think it's important to recognize that you can't have 100% security and also then have 100% privacy and zero inconvenience. We're going to have to make some choices as a society." |
| ||||
....would people dressed up in Neo-nazi militia garb in front of a polling places, billy clubs in hand skate in the same fashion? somehow, I just don't think so.
__________________ Naphta to Settembrini; “It is ultimately a cruel misunderstanding of youth to believe it will find its heart’s desire in freedom, when truly, its deepest desire is to obey.” ( Der Zauberberg) Barack Obama -Inaugural Address Jan 2009; "As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals. . . . Those ideals still light the world, and we will not give them up for expedience's sake." Barack Obama- Friday June 2013; "I think it's important to recognize that you can't have 100% security and also then have 100% privacy and zero inconvenience. We're going to have to make some choices as a society." |
| ||||
| You have heard the expressions - "where this is smoke - there is fire"? or how about "you don't need someone to tell you this stinks...when something smells fishy...you just know it". Could interference be proved in court? Doubt it. Do you need the same level of proof to get past common sense? No...you don't. There were so many laws, SERIOUS laws broke by the black panthers when this happened - that you would have to be a fool or a partisan bat to not see political influence all over this thing. Had this been the south, had this been white supremacist wearing military-style clothing - shiiit...Obamas camp would have been all over it and the Aryan boys would have been hung by their balls. |
| ||||
| I saw the evidence presented and did not see how what they did was politically motivated. I did some intimidation, but i also wondered why the people did not stand up to the men and drive them out, I know they were poll watchers, but still, if it happened in my polling place iIwould never stand for their actions, and I would take immediate action to stop any aggressive behaivor by anyone. The DOJ under Bush did not prosecute and neither did Obama, but still the video does not show proof of voter intemidation to vote democrat only.
__________________ To live is to suffer~Fritz Lang-Film Director Love, peace and harmony is sorely lacking in humans around the world. |
| ||||
| I saw the evidence presented and did not see how what they did was politically motivated. I did some intimidation, but i also wondered why the people did not stand up to the men and drive them out, I know they were poll watchers, but still, if it happened in my polling place iIwould never stand for their actions, and I would take immediate action to stop any aggressive behaivor by anyone. The DOJ under Bush did not prosecute and neither did Obama, but still the video does not show proof of voter intemidation to vote democrat only. ![]() ![]() Yeah...large guys walking around in black military-style clothing, combat boots - carrying clubs...naahhh - your right...nothing intimidating about that...hell now. |
![]() |
Lower Navigation
| ||||||
| ||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|