View Single Post
  #62 (permalink)  
Old 12-19-2008, 12:41 PM
editec editec is offline
Mr. Forgot-it-All
Member #11278
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Maine
Posts: 16,793
Thanks: 1,057
Thanked 1,014 Times in 770 Posts
Rep Power: 159
editec could successfully start his own religioneditec could successfully start his own religioneditec could successfully start his own religioneditec could successfully start his own religioneditec could successfully start his own religioneditec could successfully start his own religioneditec could successfully start his own religion
editec could successfully start his own religioneditec could successfully start his own religioneditec could successfully start his own religioneditec could successfully start his own religioneditec could successfully start his own religioneditec could successfully start his own religion
Quote: Originally Posted by Toro View Post
What is occurring is called a "liquidity trap."

Liquidity trap - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Nice link, Toro.

I found this VERY INTERESTING
Quote:


Milton Friedman suggested that a monetary authority can escape a liquidity trap by bypassing financial intermediaries to give money directly to consumers or businesses. This is referred to as a money gift or as helicopter money. The term helicopter money is meant to portray the image of a central banker dropping money on people from a helicopter. Political considerations make it difficult for a monetary authority to grant the money gift, because individuals and firms not receiving free money will exert political pressure. The monetary authority must act covertly to give gift money to specific individuals or firms without appearing to give money away.
I find the above interesting given that Milton Friendman is better known as this:
Quote:

Originally a Keynesian supporter of the New Deal and advocate of high taxes, in the 1950s his reinterpretation of the Keynesian consumption function challenged the basic Keynesian model. In the 1960s he promoted an alternative macroeconomic policy called monetarism. He theorized there existed a "natural rate of unemployment" and he argued the central government could not micromanage the economy because people would realize what the government was doing and shift their behavior to neutralize the impact of policies. He rejected the Phillips Curve and accurately predicted that Keynesian policies would cause "stagflation" (high inflation and low growth). He argued that a steady expansion of the money supply was the only wise policy, and warned against efforts by the treasury or central bank to do otherwise.
Funny how he seems to have changed his tune now that the Banking Mafia has broken cpitalism, isn't it?

Guess we're all Kynesians now.
Reply With Quote