Thread: Guy who requested $740 million in earmarks on Palin: You can’t really be for change i
View Single Post
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 10-05-2008, 09:03 PM
Larkinn Larkinn is offline
Registered User
Member #5690
  
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 5,598
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 46
Larkinn has a reputation beyond reputeLarkinn has a reputation beyond reputeLarkinn has a reputation beyond reputeLarkinn has a reputation beyond repute
Larkinn has a reputation beyond reputeLarkinn has a reputation beyond reputeLarkinn has a reputation beyond reputeLarkinn has a reputation beyond reputeLarkinn has a reputation beyond reputeLarkinn has a reputation beyond reputeLarkinn has a reputation beyond reputeLarkinn has a reputation beyond reputeLarkinn has a reputation beyond reputeLarkinn has a reputation beyond reputeLarkinn has a reputation beyond reputeLarkinn has a reputation beyond reputeLarkinn has a reputation beyond repute
Quote: Originally Posted by The Paperboy View Post
A tax cut means a person/industry/company gets to keep more of its' money. The money is the persons/industries/companies money, not the governments, that is, until the government takes it from the person/industry/company and earmarks it for another person/industry/company.

Earmark is Australian for "buying votes".
Semantics. Whether the government takes money from you and then gives it back, or just takes less is the same damn thing.
Reply With Quote