Thread: Guy who requested $740 million in earmarks on Palin: You can’t really be for change i
View Single Post
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 10-05-2008, 08:51 PM
DavidS's Avatar
DavidS DavidS is offline
Cupid gets the point
Member #11861
  
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 9,455
Thanks: 150
Thanked 225 Times in 163 Posts
Rep Power: 55
DavidS could be the buddhaDavidS could be the buddhaDavidS could be the buddhaDavidS could be the buddhaDavidS could be the buddhaDavidS could be the buddha
DavidS could be the buddhaDavidS could be the buddhaDavidS could be the buddhaDavidS could be the buddhaDavidS could be the buddhaDavidS could be the buddhaDavidS could be the buddhaDavidS could be the buddhaDavidS could be the buddhaDavidS could be the buddhaDavidS could be the buddhaDavidS could be the buddhaDavidS could be the buddha
Quote: Originally Posted by The Paperboy View Post
A tax cut means a person/industry/company gets to keep more of its' money. The money is the persons/industries/companies money, not the governments, that is, until the government takes it from the person/industry/company and earmarks it for another person/industry/company.

Earmark is Australian for "buying votes".
And John McCain voted FOR $150 billion worth of earmarks. This is, after he promised to veto ANY bill that had earmarks. So which is it? Is he going to start rejecting earmarks after he becomes president or did he not even read that bill that he just signed?
Reply With Quote