Quote: Originally Posted by Jeepers Your equating Sarahs crimes with Clintons crimes.. you are admitting guilt... You didnt refute what I said. This means that you know there is truth in it. That the charges are irrefutable. You spin this to say, "Well clinton broke the law".
To answer your question. If a crime was commited then he should have been held accountable for it.. Not really sure why bring it up now however.. He was exonerated . That's the point.
__________________ "Some men eventually stumble over the truth but they usually pick themselves up and walk on as if nothing ever happened."
-Winston Churchill
"In religion and politics, people's beliefs and convictions are in almost every case gotten at second-hand, and without examination, from authorities who have not themselves examined the questions at issue, but have taken them at second-hand from other non-examiners, whose opinions about them were not worth a brass farthing." -Mark Twain |