Quote:
Originally Posted by Ravi  It sounds like his idea of peer review is a bunch of people posting comments online. I'm pretty sure the scientific community has a different definition of peer review.
What purpose does it serve for Monckton to lie like this? |
That's the million dollar question. He sure went to some great lengths if he's lieing. He wrote a paper. Added 3000 words of clarification from what would have to be fake reviews. And wrote a letter to the president of the APS. From listening to him speak I have no reason to believe he's lieing. The facts that I understand in his paper are not really in contention. We have indeed experienced no warming in the last 7-10 years.