Thread: Real evidnce against AGW
View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 08-11-2008, 08:11 AM
Ravi Ravi is offline
out to lunch
  
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,678
Rep Power: 215
Ravi could successfully start his own religionRavi could successfully start his own religionRavi could successfully start his own religionRavi could successfully start his own religionRavi could successfully start his own religionRavi could successfully start his own religionRavi could successfully start his own religionRavi could successfully start his own religionRavi could successfully start his own religionRavi could successfully start his own religionRavi could successfully start his own religion
It sounds like his idea of peer review is a bunch of people posting comments online. I'm pretty sure the scientific community has a different definition of peer review.

What purpose does it serve for Monckton to lie like this?
Reply With Quote