View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 08-04-2008, 03:26 PM
ReillyT ReillyT is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 2,509
Rep Power: 79
ReillyT could be the buddhaReillyT could be the buddhaReillyT could be the buddhaReillyT could be the buddhaReillyT could be the buddhaReillyT could be the buddhaReillyT could be the buddhaReillyT could be the buddhaReillyT could be the buddhaReillyT could be the buddhaReillyT could be the buddha
Quote:
Originally Posted by AllieBaba View Post
And they were released when the threat was over. So there was no long-term erosion of freedom.
Lincoln ignored the Due Process provisions with respect to US citizens. Roosevelt followed suit 80 years later. Bush again tried it recently. Do you see a pattern? Does a continuing practice of suspending rights during wartime not qualify as an erosion of liberty? Do rights cease to matter when the Executive (or Legislative) branches say so?
Reply With Quote