View Single Post
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 07-30-2008, 10:12 AM
Bern80 Bern80 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,047
Rep Power: 42
Bern80 has a reputation beyond reputeBern80 has a reputation beyond reputeBern80 has a reputation beyond reputeBern80 has a reputation beyond reputeBern80 has a reputation beyond reputeBern80 has a reputation beyond reputeBern80 has a reputation beyond reputeBern80 has a reputation beyond reputeBern80 has a reputation beyond reputeBern80 has a reputation beyond reputeBern80 has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orange_Juice View Post
The theory is sound. Your numbers, or lack of, are not though. Cutting back can save massive amounts of oil that can never be replaced. Drilling will only bring so much oil to the surface to be used. We possess 3% of the world's known reserves yet use 25% of the oil. You do the math. Where is there more room for improvement, the supply or demand side?

On top of that, with China's economy growing by 10% a year there is no way the world can even think of meeting that demand without serious conservation efforts
Let's see here. "Cutting back can save massive amounts of oil that can be replaced.'....with even more oil if we started drilling...

There is room for both. We haven't touched a majority of the oil we have immediate access to in our own borders.
__________________
It's time for another Ronny in the White House.

Last edited by Bern80; 07-30-2008 at 10:13 AM.
Reply With Quote