View Single Post
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 07-24-2008, 10:02 PM
jreeves's Avatar
jreeves jreeves is offline
Registered User
Member #8708
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,333
Thanks: 71
Thanked 84 Times in 74 Posts
Rep Power: 91
jreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddha
jreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddhajreeves could be the buddha
Quote: Originally Posted by Gunny View Post
Shale is not cost effective. We have 10s of thousands of oil wells in this country that are capped with still a 3rd of their resourses untapped because the deeper into the well you go, the more sludge you get. It costs more to get and to refine. The oil companies closed them rather than take less profit.

I don't know how much that amounts to, but it, like the shale is there.
Actually Shell is clammering at the possibility of using oil shale but it is being blocked by one senator. There is over 800 billion barrels of oil by conservative estimates.
__________________
Be thankful we're not getting all the government we're paying for.
Will Rogers
Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel or envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.

Winston Churchill
And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you—ask what you can do for your country.

JFK
No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session. -- Mark Twain
Reply With Quote