View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 07-17-2008, 10:22 AM
busara's Avatar
busara busara is offline
wanasiasa wapumbava
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: PA
Posts: 1,491
Rep Power: 11
busara could be city mayorbusara could be city mayorbusara could be city mayorbusara could be city mayorbusara could be city mayorbusara could be city mayorbusara could be city mayorbusara could be city mayorbusara could be city mayorbusara could be city mayorbusara could be city mayor
Quote:
Originally Posted by KMAN View Post
would you rather have Social Security or a 401k for your reitrement plan? and why?


My thought is a 401k... I don't really believe Social Security is going to be there for me when I retire unless we keep increasing taxes. Plus where in the constitution does it say that other people should pay for my retirement? Besides I think I could get a better rate of return on my money than the government could with my money. That way when I die my kids will get my 401k money...they definitely won't be getting my Social Security money.

What does everyone think?
it is my understanding that social security was never meant to be a retirement plan, just extra income to help pay for medical expenses as you get older. am i wrong on this?
__________________
sealybobo thinks im a racist right winger. RGS thinks im a braindead liberal. I wonder which one I am?

the best view is from the middle

“Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber.” Plato

“Politics is the gentle art of getting votes from the poor and campaign funds from the rich by promising to protect each from the other” Oscar Ameringer

"I believe there are more instances of the abridgement of freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments by those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations. ... The means of defense against foreign danger historically have become the instruments of tyranny at home." James Madison
Reply With Quote