Quote:
Originally Posted by manifold  It looks like Neil Entwistle is guilty as sin. But do you think it is acceptable to have one's internet surfing history admitted as evidence? That is, acceptable from the standpoint of your personal philosophical leanings, not according to your interpretation of the US Constitution, common law, or case law precedent. Entwistle defense team faces setbacks - The Boston Globe | How is that any different from getting a search warrant to go through your underwear drawer ? 
__________________
"Some men eventually stumble over the truth but they usually pick themselves up and walk on as if nothing ever happened."
-Winston Churchill
"But though there is no difference in this respect between the best demagogue and the worst, both of them having to present their cases equally in terms of melodrama, there is all the difference in the world between the statesman who is humbugging the people into allowing him to do the will of God, in whatever disguise it may come to him, and one who is humbugging them into furthering his personal ambition and the commercial interests of the plutocrats who own the newspapers and support him on reciprocal terms."
-George Bernard Shaw |