View Single Post
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-04-2009, 01:43 AM
JBeukema JBeukema is offline
Banned
Member #19207
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 8,659
Thanks: 347
Thanked 196 Times in 171 Posts
Rep Power: 0
JBeukema could be the buddhaJBeukema could be the buddhaJBeukema could be the buddhaJBeukema could be the buddhaJBeukema could be the buddha
JBeukema could be the buddhaJBeukema could be the buddhaJBeukema could be the buddhaJBeukema could be the buddhaJBeukema could be the buddhaJBeukema could be the buddhaJBeukema could be the buddhaJBeukema could be the buddhaJBeukema could be the buddha
Doubts Cast On Credibility Of Some Published Clinical Trials

Quote:
Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) are considered the 'gold standard' research method for assessing new medical treatments. But research published in BioMed Central's open access journal Trials shows that the design of a remarkable 93 percent of 2235 so-called RCTs published in some Chinese medical journals during 1994 to 2005 was flawed, casting doubt on the reliability of research that is likely to influence medical decision-makers.
Of course, the fact they they from China didn't raise flags in the first place?

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0702184146.htm

Last edited by JBeukema; 07-04-2009 at 01:59 AM. Reason: Forgot to post source
Reply With Quote
Remove advertisements
Advertisement
Sponsored links