View Single Post
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 06-24-2009, 09:41 AM
Navy1960's Avatar
Navy1960 Navy1960 is offline
Registered User
Member #11841
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Arizona
Posts: 4,398
Thanks: 342
Thanked 639 Times in 433 Posts
Rep Power: 84
Navy1960 could be the buddhaNavy1960 could be the buddha
Navy1960 could be the buddhaNavy1960 could be the buddhaNavy1960 could be the buddhaNavy1960 could be the buddhaNavy1960 could be the buddhaNavy1960 could be the buddha
Quote: Originally Posted by toomuchtime_ View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by Navy1960 View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by toomuchtime_ View Post

None of the health insurance "reforms" being proposed in Congress would lower health care costs. On the contrary, every one of them would raise health care costs and that increase in costs would be paid for with hirer taxes or larger deficits. When Obama tries to sell his health insurance proposals by saying they will lower health care costs or slow the rate of increase he is clearly lying.
toomuchtime, I think if issues such as Illegal Immigration healthcare costs are not addressed, and drug costs, along with several other factors. The result of all of this will be exactly what you have said, higher costs, lower quality care, and higher taxes. That is why I have said that its best that the individual states decide for themselves what is best for them. As whats best for Ca. is not whats best for Az.
Of course, there is nothing to prevent states from making changes in their health care systems now, but if federal money is involved, it should, imo, be aimed at achieving specific health outcomes. That means the states would not be able to decide what they would try to achieve with federal money but would have some discretion about how they would achieve it. This is, in fact, how the Medicaid and SCHIP programs work.
I was thinking more along the lines of a hybrid of tax credit that is used to pay state premiums for healthcare This money would in turn find it's way back to the Fed in the form if taxes paid by the states and the providers. more or less like a closed loop. The more people enter the bigger the pool/ However its my opinion the states should be the source for all this , the Fed. should only provide incentives for those states to do so.
__________________
God grant me the courage not to give up what I think is right even though I think it is hopeless.
Chester W. Nimitz
Reply With Quote