View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 06-24-2009, 08:58 AM
Navy1960's Avatar
Navy1960 Navy1960 is offline
Registered User
Member #11841
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Arizona
Posts: 4,398
Thanks: 342
Thanked 639 Times in 433 Posts
Rep Power: 84
Navy1960 could be the buddhaNavy1960 could be the buddha
Navy1960 could be the buddhaNavy1960 could be the buddhaNavy1960 could be the buddhaNavy1960 could be the buddhaNavy1960 could be the buddhaNavy1960 could be the buddha
Quote: Originally Posted by toomuchtime_ View Post
Quote: Originally Posted by auditor0007 View Post
There would be nothing wrong with mandating that each state deal with health insurance in this manner. The bottom line is that in order to reduce healthcare costs for everyone, everyone must be covered and must also pay something into the system, regardless who is running that system.
None of the health insurance "reforms" being proposed in Congress would lower health care costs. On the contrary, every one of them would raise health care costs and that increase in costs would be paid for with hirer taxes or larger deficits. When Obama tries to sell his health insurance proposals by saying they will lower health care costs or slow the rate of increase he is clearly lying.
toomuchtime, I think if issues such as Illegal Immigration healthcare costs are not addressed, and drug costs, along with several other factors. The result of all of this will be exactly what you have said, higher costs, lower quality care, and higher taxes. That is why I have said that its best that the individual states decide for themselves what is best for them. As whats best for Ca. is not whats best for Az.
__________________
God grant me the courage not to give up what I think is right even though I think it is hopeless.
Chester W. Nimitz
Reply With Quote