Quote: Originally Posted by
del 
Quote: Originally Posted by
Nik
Quote: Originally Posted by
del
and we come back to what part of "serves at the pleasure of the president" confuses you? certainly, the us attorney in your ridiculous example would have recourse, but s/he wouldn't have a job.
or do you think when clinton had reno fire all the us attorneys in 1993, every single one of them was fired for cause?
pull your head out of your ass and take a deep breath; your brain is clearly starved for oxygen.
Theres a difference between being able to fire someone not for cause, and being able to fire someone for anything and everything.
what would that difference be, ace?
this should be weak.
If one case you can fire someone for refusing to have sex with you. In one case you can't.
Well, that was easy. Of course you are likely too stupid to be able to comprehend that simple difference, but ah well.