Quote: Originally Posted by
xsited1 
Quote: Originally Posted by
YWN666
Show me some independent research that shows a direct link betwen eating soy and homosexuality and I will state that I am a troll. Are you stupid enough to think that in all of the years of controversy over what causes homosexuality that the major peer reviewed medical journals would not have picked up on this alleged soy-homosexuality link? No, they have better things to do than to waste time with WND bullshit designed to entertain gullible halfwits like you.
I gotta go. Can someone alert me when this xsited troll comes up with the research I asked for? Thanks
There are plenty of references in the material you posted and you chose to ignore all of them. Now you're trying to throw it back on me because you admitted something incredibly stupid and juvenile.
OWNED! Last post here, I promise. This was a fun thread which challenged common beliefs. I did find one other link I'd like to share for the non-Flat-worlders who might be interested:
Is Soy Linked to Homosexuality?
Here are a couple of quotes from the above link:
Quote:
My first reaction was as I said above, utter disbelief. It sounds like a complete farce and frankly I was totally embarassed for Rutz for his use of the term “Devil food” in the title. Come on, Jim - that sounds like a joke. Upon reading the article, however, my curiosity was piqued regarding the veracity of an estrogen-soy link. I looked it up and soy really is closely related to estrogen and falls into a category of food that can exacerbate hormone-related problems.
Quote:
It’s an interesting finding, but Rutz did a horrible job of approaching the issue. It’s almost like the Hollywood portrait of Christian ignorance for someone to use “Devil” as a prefix for anything and everything they find questionable. I’m reminded of Bobby Buchet’s mother in The Water Boy.
There is something here, but only those unencumbered by the homosexual PC agenda would even look at the connection. Unfortunately, that only leaves people like Rutz. He could have presented the data better, but the information is sound nonetheless.
More