The Miserable End of Darwinian Evolution

[scruffy]

Do you not think it's safe platting a small community on a flat piece of paper? ... even though we know it's the surface of a sphere and not flat ...

Sounds like you support spontaneous generation ... you know ... just make a pile of human filth and mice spontaneously come into existence ... none of that mutanism bullshit for you eh? ...

San Francisco proves it. You leave enough shit lying around for long enough, you get rats. No one knows where they come from, they just magically appear.

 

[Libby von H]

You mean an ellipsoid? ... you don't know much about Creationism it seems ...

You just don't know the meaning of words, DOLT
Yes, an ellipsoid is a spheroid. A spheroid is a three-dimensional shape created from a two-dimensional ellipse.

 

[ReinyDays]

You just don't know the meaning of words, DOLT
Yes, an ellipsoid is a spheroid. A spheroid is a three-dimensional shape created from a two-dimensional ellipse.

You mean a geoid? ...

Geoid - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Anything to avoid posting about evolution ... that's smart ...

 

[ReinyDays]

San Francisco proves it. You leave enough shit lying around for long enough, you get rats. No one knows where they come from, they just magically appear.

It's not magic ... buck-o ... it's a miracle !!! ...

 

[Libby von H]

Plogisten was also an "accepted fact." Obviously you know little about science and its propensity for error. The silly saw that it has "a self-correcting mechanism" is absurd. Every animal and plant also has "a self-correcting mechanism," called "trial and error."
Roots that do not find water die and new ones are sent in different directions, "scientifically" to mock the nonsense.

There are hundreds of scientists who have signed the Dissent From Darwinism, just as there are hundreds of others who have signed the document, "No Climate Change Emergency." Hundreds of scientists cannot manufacture reasons to dissent from hundred fifty year old tautologies and censorship and stubbornness born of pride.

A>B>C>D is not science, it is unintelligent

A topnotch WordPress.com site

theevolutionfraud.wordpress.com

You are right and I just want you to know I say that.
Yes, only people who love science (but have never actually studied science) say that 'self-correcting science' nonsense.
Folks took Aristotle's (a heavy ball falls faster) for over 1000 years. we have a mind and we have a will and in science amateurs WILL is hugely overlooked.

 

[Hollie]

You are right and I just want you to know I say that.
Yes, only people who love science (but have never actually studied science) say that 'self-correcting science' nonsense.
Folks took Aristotle's (a heavy ball falls faster) for over 1000 years. we have a mind and we have a will and in science amateurs WILL is hugely overlooked.

And for 2,000 years and counting, folks took tales and fables about the planet being 6,000 years old as true.

 

[Libby von H]

And for 2,000 years and counting, folks took tales and fables about the planet being 6,000 years old as true.

False and your repeating it does not make it true.
Anyway in LOGIC your proving your enemy is wrong DOES NOT PROVE YOU RIGHT.
MORON

 

[Hollie]

False and your repeating it does not make it true.
Anyway in LOGIC your proving your enemy is wrong DOES NOT PROVE YOU RIGHT.
MORON

Religious extremists do tend to get angry and emotive when their sacred cows are called into question.

 

[ChemEngineer]

Website just updated:

TheMiserableEndOfEvolution

 

[Hollie]

Website just updated:

TheMiserableEndOfEvolution

Updated with more cut and paste “quotes” from Harun Yahya?

 

[scruffy]

Website just updated:

TheMiserableEndOfEvolution

lol

Evolution - running rings around the doubters for 4 billion years.

As part of normal bodily functions, a cell’s DNA sends out “messages” to other parts of the cell to create specific proteins. These proteins are the building blocks of organisms. For instance, if the body needs to build more muscle, the DNA sends out a message triggering the production of more muscle proteins. These DNA “messages” are strands of RNA. siRNA (also known as “small interfering RNA”) is a specially designed RNA molecule used to disrupt the expression of a particular gene.
Using siRNA, scientists can create specific RNA strands or “messages” to address complex problems. These RNA strands direct the cells’ own machinery to attack and destroy other naturally occurring RNA strands that have complementary nucleotide sequences. Such “interfering” allows scientists to use the body’s natural defenses to eliminate the production of certain proteins. APHIS Wildlife Services scientists hope to harness the power of siRNA to improve the selectivity and effectiveness of wildlife damage management tools, such as contraceptives, repellents, and toxicants.

I love the part about using DNA to get rid of pests.

Solutions through Science: Exploring Emerging Genetic Technologies | Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

Welcome to our Solutions through Science series—join us as we explore how APHIS is developing and applying the latest science and technologies to deliver our mission of protecting the health and value of American agriculture—today and into the future!What if we could modify an animal or plant’s...

www.aphis.usda.gov

 

[scruffy]

Website just updated:

TheMiserableEndOfEvolution

By the way - you should learn.probability theory instead of dinking with web sites.

The probability of forming a peptide bond is 50%. The probability of getting a properly folded chain of amino acids joined by peptide bonds is 1 in 10164, which means that on average, 10164 chains of amino acids 150 units long are needed to find one that is useful.

Confirmed by ChatGPT. Which you could have done yourself if you had an open mind.

But you spend your time watching Origins and you believe every word of their bleeding bullshit.

Functional proteins from a random-sequence library - Nature

Functional primordial proteins presumably originated from random sequences, but it is not known how frequently functional, or even folded, proteins occur in collections of random sequences. Here we have used in vitro selection of messenger RNA displayed proteins, in which each protein is...

www.nature.com

This experiment here, takes 1 hour and 30 minutes. After that you get enough peptide bonding to measure spectroscopically.

In situ observation of peptide bond formation at the water–air interface

We report unambiguous spectroscopic evidence of peptide bond formation at the air–water interface, yielding a possible mechanism providing insight into the formation of modern ribosomal peptide bonds, and a means for the emergence of peptides ...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

 

[scruffy]

The original Miller and Urey experiment took one week.

Conducting Miller-Urey Experiments

In 1953, Stanley Miller reported the production of biomolecules from simple gaseous starting materials, using an apparatus constructed to simulate the primordial Earth's atmosphere-ocean system. Miller introduced 200 ml of water, 100 mmHg of H[2] , 200 ...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

It resulted in 10 different kinds of dipeptides.

Miller’s forgotten experiments point to primitive protein genesis

50-year-old test tubes hold clues to formation of peptide bonds - and life - on early Earth

www.chemistryworld.com

The results blow the idiotically naive assertions of impossibility right out of the water. (Pun intended).

It ain't impossible when you're.looking at it.

Like Grossman said to Einstein, something must be wrong with your math.

 

[initforme]

There's a massive amount of births and some lesser believe theirs somehow a decline. Wow oh wow.

 

[ChemEngineer]

Darwinian evolution has led more people to atheism than any other lie.

Evolution remains controversial in American society, with roughly half of individuals rejecting human evolution (Miller et al., 2006; Gallup, 2019). Although there are aspects of evolutionary theory that are mostly accepted by college biology students (for instance, adaptation by natural selection), studies show that college biology students struggle to accept human evolution and the common ancestry of life on Earth. Almost half of the general college population does not accept that all of life evolved (Barnes et al., 2008), and in one study, more than a quarter of upper-level biology students did not accept that all of life on Earth is related (Ingram and Nelson, 2006). - (www.LifeSciEd.org)

 

[ChemEngineer]

“For over 20 years I thought I was working on evolution….But there was not one thing I knew about it… So for the last few weeks I’ve tried putting a simple question to various people, the question is, “Can you tell me any one thing that is true?” I tried that question on the Geology staff at the Field Museum of Natural History and the only answer I got was silence. I tried it on the members of the Evolutionary Morphology Seminar in the University of Chicago, A very prestigious body of Evolutionists, and all I got there was silence for a long time and eventually one person said, “Yes, I do know one thing, it ought not to be taught in High School”….over the past few years….you have experienced a shift from Evolution as knowledge to evolution as faith…Evolution not only conveys no knowledge, but seems somehow to convey anti-knowledge.” - (Dr. Collin Patterson evolutionist, address at the American Museum of Natural History, New York City, Nov. 1981)

 

[frigidweirdo]

Plogisten was also an "accepted fact." Obviously you know little about science and its propensity for error. The silly saw that it has "a self-correcting mechanism" is absurd. Every animal and plant also has "a self-correcting mechanism," called "trial and error."
Roots that do not find water die and new ones are sent in different directions, "scientifically" to mock the nonsense.

There are hundreds of scientists who have signed the Dissent From Darwinism, just as there are hundreds of others who have signed the document, "No Climate Change Emergency." Hundreds of scientists cannot manufacture reasons to dissent from hundred fifty year old tautologies and censorship and stubbornness born of pride.

A>B>C>D is not science, it is unintelligent

A topnotch WordPress.com site

theevolutionfraud.wordpress.com

Evolution is accepted because we can see it. We can use fruit flies and see their evolution because they breed and die so quickly. It's not necessarily accepted as fact.

That "hundreds of scientists".... what is a scientist? Someone with a science degree? Someone who can spell "science"? Some dude who goes to church and is fanatical about his religion who goes online to a science forum and calls himself a "scientist"?

 

[scruffy]

This idiotic thread is NOT science.

Has nothing to do with science.

Just a bunch of hate brained ignorance.

I have no time for this kinda crap. Bye now.