Why many on the left irrationally fear "fascism"

[Ringo]

Fascism is hard right conservative.

 

[lafayette]

I believe, that, in some cases, it isn't really "fascism", nor "oppression" which those on the left fear, so much as the reality of their immoral behaviors, views, lifestyles, and so forth.

And that's it's not really a case of fascism, so much as just a wake-up call from reality, it itself having a "fascist bias" to those on the left.

A left-wing degenerate, for example, may simply not like the idea of being told that pedophilia is wrong or evil, not merely just "socially unaccepted", that elements of society are naturally hierarchical, and that much of their misery Is self-created, as a result of their own immoral worldviews, miseducation, misinformation, and lifestyles, rather than a conspiracy theory invented by "rich cis white heterosexual male Christian capitalist NWO elites" designed to oppress them, publicly and privately, merely a case of society naturally rewarding moral, thinking men and women at the rightful expense of less moral and competent ones.

In the same vein, one of a degenerate, 6th grade education, to whom their favorite progressive blog or media network, marketed to those who's intelligence and education stunted at those levels, designed to exploit them by preying on their immorality, vices, and sociopathic lust for a since of victimhood.

They may be adverse, for example, to being taught that not being a fatuous consumer of degenerate mass media isn't an equal or better "lifestyle choice", than being a man or woman of some morality, character, and merit, such as one who is entrepreneurially minded, and more concerned with helping others is some mature, adult and sincere way (whether based on our Common Law's notion and concept of intentions, or so forth), requiring much in the way of personal development and sacrifice, as is the case of mature men and women, presently and historically who have stood the test of time, and manifested themselves as inspiring role models in whatever their endeavor of choice, from sports, to sciences, to arts, to business.

They might also simply be adverse to having to be told that indoctrinating their children into a worthless worldview, such as nihilistic atheism, progressivism, or materialism isn't just an "alternative lifestyle choice", but is morally and ethically wrong, immature, and ultimately worthless, easily debunkable, and deconstruct able, along with the false faiths, lies, misinformation, conflations, or other silly axioms upon which it is founded on or predicated on to begin with.

Instead having an aversion to society and its institutions, such as the Common Law system, founded on principles, including "religious" ones, such as respect for other people, their families, their property rights, their personal autonomy, and so forth - objecting instead to the notion of this religious morality, and the thinking men and women behind it, such as Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendall Holmes, who helped to founded it and ensure it's perpetuation.

The very notion of law or morality of any sort being imposed upon them, when in reality that is the function of the law and those who make it, to impose it on those who have none, and refuse to do it themselves, living only for the satiation of primitive impulses, self-invented myths and fabrications to justify their immoral sentiments and worthless life pursuits, and drives, such as revenge - which the very law itself was intended to subordinate and take precedence over - much as the very notion of other institutions which they attribute to their sociopathic victimhood and persecutory conspiracies, whether families, traditions, healthy marriages, culture and civilization itself, even maybe the very English language.

Ultimately, what I believe they fear are just well-adjusted normal people, or any civilization of any lasting merit, and those of whom have been any lasting merit to them, from Mill to Kirk, would thankfully have no use for them, given that objections, say to the notion that pedophilia is morally reprehensible, not merely "socially unaccepted", or that genetics, psychology such as the evolutionary psychology of Steven Pinker and others, medicine, and biology indicate that sex and gender have innate origins, with most growing out of various "confusions" upon social maturation past adolescence, not requiring genital removal, nor being part of a "religious" conspiracy theory, just something universally observable enough that all sources, whether erroneously described as "religious" or "secular" have been able to make some measure of observations upon it, nor any childish myths of "trans people" having existed, or held any "sacred status" in ancient cultures only to be "repressed" as part of the conspiracy. or whatever silly little myths the cult members in question might like to content themselves with.

Ultimately, it isn't "fascism" that they fear; sure, fascists would object to this, but so would most well-adjusted normal people of some character, merit or decency - much as how a Communist might insincerely decry "greed" in a general sense (except for his own private property, in the case of the typical "bourgeoise" communist), but Jesus doing so does not make him a communist, nor does it mean he wants to "abolish private property".

So no, ultimately many or most of the conspiracists in question do not really fear "fascism", they simply don't like being told what they do, believe, feel and so forth, are morally wrong, by society and its institutions as a whole. If they want to believe, that pedophilia or pedastry is simply a "lifestyle choice", or that their inability to succeed in society isn't based on a "racist, white" conspiracy theory, but simply on the basis of better men and women who make up society wanting nothing to do with them, and for good reason.

MLK would want no more to do with these ilk than any white person of some reknown, such as a scientist like Marie Curie or Issac Newton would want to do with the KKK merely by the misfortune of having shared genetic ancestry with them.

Perhaps changing your behaviors, beliefs, lifestyles, and so forth is the better option, then you won't rightfully have to fear "fascism", "the law", or "society", in the sense of the meritocratic, thinking men and women who comprise most of it that has any lasting value or merit having to object to you, tell you "what to do" when you should be doing it own your own, and so forth. Nor will you have to appeal to your naïve faith in "the Constitution", not even knowing what your own "rights", "freeze peach", and so forth are to begin with, as per thinkers on the subject such as Supreme Court Justice Scalia, per Originalism who argues that it doesn't technically give you a right to utter "fighting words", including on the internet.

You fear that reality and the whole world is against you, because you are against reality and the whole world, it merely having a "conservative, Christian, or white" bias, depending on your flavor of conspiracy theory, or other archaic notions, ideas, dishonesties, or sentiments, from which you derive said silly things to begin with.

Asshole. Mussolini and Hitler are not reason enough?

 

[lafayette]

Thanks for making no sense at all.

 

[surada]

No, not at all. And it is not the democrat party either.

Yes, fascism was embraced by hard right Italian conservatives. Look up Fascists of the 20th century.

 

[elektra]

Yes, fascism was embraced by hard right Italian conservatives. Look up Fascists of the 20th century.

Italian conservatism has no relation to American conservatism.

 

[elektra]

Yes, fascism was embraced by hard right Italian conservatives.

Once Fascism takes over, there is no conservatism. You should start a thread on Italian Fascism.

 

[elektra]

Yes, fascism was embraced by hard right Italian conservatives. Look up Fascists of the 20th century.

German Fascism was embraced by the Democrat party. Look it up, start with the New York Times cover up of the Holocaust.

Look up, Roosevelt denied sanctuary and migration rights to Jews who died in Holocaust.

Look up, Roosevelt arrested and imprisoned 120,000 American citizens based on race.

 

[surada]

So you think Hitler, Mussolini and Franco were liberals?

 

[Lesh]

I believe, that, in some cases, it isn't really "fascism", nor "oppression" which those on the left fear, so much as the reality of their immoral behaviors, views, lifestyles, and so forth.

And that's it's not really a case of fascism, so much as just a wake-up call from reality, it itself having a "fascist bias" to those on the left.

A left-wing degenerate, for example, may simply not like the idea of being told that pedophilia is wrong or evil, not merely just "socially unaccepted", that elements of society are naturally hierarchical, and that much of their misery Is self-created, as a result of their own immoral worldviews, miseducation, misinformation, and lifestyles, rather than a conspiracy theory invented by "rich cis white heterosexual male Christian capitalist NWO elites" designed to oppress them, publicly and privately, merely a case of society naturally rewarding moral, thinking men and women at the rightful expense of less moral and competent ones.

In the same vein, one of a degenerate, 6th grade education, to whom their favorite progressive blog or media network, marketed to those who's intelligence and education stunted at those levels, designed to exploit them by preying on their immorality, vices, and sociopathic lust for a since of victimhood.

They may be adverse, for example, to being taught that not being a fatuous consumer of degenerate mass media isn't an equal or better "lifestyle choice", than being a man or woman of some morality, character, and merit, such as one who is entrepreneurially minded, and more concerned with helping others is some mature, adult and sincere way (whether based on our Common Law's notion and concept of intentions, or so forth), requiring much in the way of personal development and sacrifice, as is the case of mature men and women, presently and historically who have stood the test of time, and manifested themselves as inspiring role models in whatever their endeavor of choice, from sports, to sciences, to arts, to business.

They might also simply be adverse to having to be told that indoctrinating their children into a worthless worldview, such as nihilistic atheism, progressivism, or materialism isn't just an "alternative lifestyle choice", but is morally and ethically wrong, immature, and ultimately worthless, easily debunkable, and deconstruct able, along with the false faiths, lies, misinformation, conflations, or other silly axioms upon which it is founded on or predicated on to begin with.

Instead having an aversion to society and its institutions, such as the Common Law system, founded on principles, including "religious" ones, such as respect for other people, their families, their property rights, their personal autonomy, and so forth - objecting instead to the notion of this religious morality, and the thinking men and women behind it, such as Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendall Holmes, who helped to founded it and ensure it's perpetuation.

The very notion of law or morality of any sort being imposed upon them, when in reality that is the function of the law and those who make it, to impose it on those who have none, and refuse to do it themselves, living only for the satiation of primitive impulses, self-invented myths and fabrications to justify their immoral sentiments and worthless life pursuits, and drives, such as revenge - which the very law itself was intended to subordinate and take precedence over - much as the very notion of other institutions which they attribute to their sociopathic victimhood and persecutory conspiracies, whether families, traditions, healthy marriages, culture and civilization itself, even maybe the very English language.

Ultimately, what I believe they fear are just well-adjusted normal people, or any civilization of any lasting merit, and those of whom have been any lasting merit to them, from Mill to Kirk, would thankfully have no use for them, given that objections, say to the notion that pedophilia is morally reprehensible, not merely "socially unaccepted", or that genetics, psychology such as the evolutionary psychology of Steven Pinker and others, medicine, and biology indicate that sex and gender have innate origins, with most growing out of various "confusions" upon social maturation past adolescence, not requiring genital removal, nor being part of a "religious" conspiracy theory, just something universally observable enough that all sources, whether erroneously described as "religious" or "secular" have been able to make some measure of observations upon it, nor any childish myths of "trans people" having existed, or held any "sacred status" in ancient cultures only to be "repressed" as part of the conspiracy. or whatever silly little myths the cult members in question might like to content themselves with.

Ultimately, it isn't "fascism" that they fear; sure, fascists would object to this, but so would most well-adjusted normal people of some character, merit or decency - much as how a Communist might insincerely decry "greed" in a general sense (except for his own private property, in the case of the typical "bourgeoise" communist), but Jesus doing so does not make him a communist, nor does it mean he wants to "abolish private property".

So no, ultimately many or most of the conspiracists in question do not really fear "fascism", they simply don't like being told what they do, believe, feel and so forth, are morally wrong, by society and its institutions as a whole. If they want to believe, that pedophilia or pedastry is simply a "lifestyle choice", or that their inability to succeed in society isn't based on a "racist, white" conspiracy theory, but simply on the basis of better men and women who make up society wanting nothing to do with them, and for good reason.

MLK would want no more to do with these ilk than any white person of some reknown, such as a scientist like Marie Curie or Issac Newton would want to do with the KKK merely by the misfortune of having shared genetic ancestry with them.

Perhaps changing your behaviors, beliefs, lifestyles, and so forth is the better option, then you won't rightfully have to fear "fascism", "the law", or "society", in the sense of the meritocratic, thinking men and women who comprise most of it that has any lasting value or merit having to object to you, tell you "what to do" when you should be doing it own your own, and so forth. Nor will you have to appeal to your naïve faith in "the Constitution", not even knowing what your own "rights", "freeze peach", and so forth are to begin with, as per thinkers on the subject such as Supreme Court Justice Scalia, per Originalism who argues that it doesn't technically give you a right to utter "fighting words", including on the internet.

You fear that reality and the whole world is against you, because you are against reality and the whole world, it merely having a "conservative, Christian, or white" bias, depending on your flavor of conspiracy theory, or other archaic notions, ideas, dishonesties, or sentiments, from which you derive said silly things to begin with.

That’s quite the treatise in favor of fascism

I’ll pass thank you

 

[Lesh]

German Fascism was embraced by the Democrat party. Look it up, start with the New York Times cover up of the Holocaust.

Look up, Roosevelt denied sanctuary and migration rights to Jews who died in Holocaust.

Look up, Roosevelt arrested and imprisoned 120,000 American citizens based on race.

Pure fucking bullshit.

The REPUBLICANS in the US we’re the biggest supporters of the Nazis

 

[Ringo]

So you think Hitler, Mussolini and Franco were liberals?

And liberals and fascists are two sides of the coin of the defenders of capitalism.

 

[surada]

Pure fucking bullshit.

The REPUBLICANS in the US we’re the biggest supporters of the Nazis

Fred Trump was part of the American Bund.

 

[elektra]

Pure fucking bullshit.

The REPUBLICANS in the US we’re the biggest supporters of the Nazis

Funny, I do not remember Roosevelt boycotting the Berlin Olympics in 1936? Roosevelt embraced the NAZI's, even supporting the Olympics in Germany!
The New Deal, the Democrats New Deal was modeled after the NAZI's and Italy's Fascist "New Deals".
You don't remember history, when in the 1930's Democrats shouted, "capitalism is dead".

Argue with the CATO institute, they are full of Democrats

https://www.cato.org/commentary/hitler-mussolini-roosevelt

What FDR had in common with the other charismatic collectivists of the 30s
Three New Deals: Reflections on Roosevelt’s America, Mussolini’s Italy, and Hitler’s Germany, 1933 – 1939, by Wolfgang Schivelbusch, New York: Metropolitan Books, 242 pages, $26
On May 7, 1933, just two months after the inauguration of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, the New York Times reporter Anne O’Hare McCormick wrote that the atmosphere in Washington was “strangely reminiscent of Rome in the first weeks after the march of the Blackshirts, of Moscow at the beginning of the Five‐Year Plan.… America today literally asks for orders.” The Roosevelt administration, she added, “envisages a federation of industry, labor and government after the fashion of the corporative State as it exists in Italy.”
That article isn’t quoted in Three New Deals, a fascinating study by the German cultural historian Wolfgang Schivelbusch. But it underscores his central argument: that there are surprising similarities between the programs of Roosevelt, Mussolini, and Hitler.

 

[Resnic]

To them facism is anything they don't want, everyone they don't like is Hitler, everyone that wants equality is a racist, and anyone that wants freedom is trying to destroy democracy.

They don't fear facism, they just jump to the most extreme possible language anytime there is something they don't like or want.

I'd wager they don't even know what facism is really. It's just a buzz word to get some attention for them. They don't understand the real horror behind the word.

 

[task0778]

Why many on the left irrationally fear "fascism"​

I don' think they fear it, they embrace it. It's exactly what they want, as long as they are the ones in charge.

 

[Boo Radley]

I believe, that, in some cases, it isn't really "fascism", nor "oppression" which those on the left fear, so much as the reality of their immoral behaviors, views, lifestyles, and so forth.

And that's it's not really a case of fascism, so much as just a wake-up call from reality, it itself having a "fascist bias" to those on the left.

A left-wing degenerate, for example, may simply not like the idea of being told that pedophilia is wrong or evil, not merely just "socially unaccepted", that elements of society are naturally hierarchical, and that much of their misery Is self-created, as a result of their own immoral worldviews, miseducation, misinformation, and lifestyles, rather than a conspiracy theory invented by "rich cis white heterosexual male Christian capitalist NWO elites" designed to oppress them, publicly and privately, merely a case of society naturally rewarding moral, thinking men and women at the rightful expense of less moral and competent ones.

In the same vein, one of a degenerate, 6th grade education, to whom their favorite progressive blog or media network, marketed to those who's intelligence and education stunted at those levels, designed to exploit them by preying on their immorality, vices, and sociopathic lust for a since of victimhood.

They may be adverse, for example, to being taught that not being a fatuous consumer of degenerate mass media isn't an equal or better "lifestyle choice", than being a man or woman of some morality, character, and merit, such as one who is entrepreneurially minded, and more concerned with helping others is some mature, adult and sincere way (whether based on our Common Law's notion and concept of intentions, or so forth), requiring much in the way of personal development and sacrifice, as is the case of mature men and women, presently and historically who have stood the test of time, and manifested themselves as inspiring role models in whatever their endeavor of choice, from sports, to sciences, to arts, to business.

They might also simply be adverse to having to be told that indoctrinating their children into a worthless worldview, such as nihilistic atheism, progressivism, or materialism isn't just an "alternative lifestyle choice", but is morally and ethically wrong, immature, and ultimately worthless, easily debunkable, and deconstruct able, along with the false faiths, lies, misinformation, conflations, or other silly axioms upon which it is founded on or predicated on to begin with.

Instead having an aversion to society and its institutions, such as the Common Law system, founded on principles, including "religious" ones, such as respect for other people, their families, their property rights, their personal autonomy, and so forth - objecting instead to the notion of this religious morality, and the thinking men and women behind it, such as Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendall Holmes, who helped to founded it and ensure it's perpetuation.

The very notion of law or morality of any sort being imposed upon them, when in reality that is the function of the law and those who make it, to impose it on those who have none, and refuse to do it themselves, living only for the satiation of primitive impulses, self-invented myths and fabrications to justify their immoral sentiments and worthless life pursuits, and drives, such as revenge - which the very law itself was intended to subordinate and take precedence over - much as the very notion of other institutions which they attribute to their sociopathic victimhood and persecutory conspiracies, whether families, traditions, healthy marriages, culture and civilization itself, even maybe the very English language.

Ultimately, what I believe they fear are just well-adjusted normal people, or any civilization of any lasting merit, and those of whom have been any lasting merit to them, from Mill to Kirk, would thankfully have no use for them, given that objections, say to the notion that pedophilia is morally reprehensible, not merely "socially unaccepted", or that genetics, psychology such as the evolutionary psychology of Steven Pinker and others, medicine, and biology indicate that sex and gender have innate origins, with most growing out of various "confusions" upon social maturation past adolescence, not requiring genital removal, nor being part of a "religious" conspiracy theory, just something universally observable enough that all sources, whether erroneously described as "religious" or "secular" have been able to make some measure of observations upon it, nor any childish myths of "trans people" having existed, or held any "sacred status" in ancient cultures only to be "repressed" as part of the conspiracy. or whatever silly little myths the cult members in question might like to content themselves with.

Ultimately, it isn't "fascism" that they fear; sure, fascists would object to this, but so would most well-adjusted normal people of some character, merit or decency - much as how a Communist might insincerely decry "greed" in a general sense (except for his own private property, in the case of the typical "bourgeoise" communist), but Jesus doing so does not make him a communist, nor does it mean he wants to "abolish private property".

So no, ultimately many or most of the conspiracists in question do not really fear "fascism", they simply don't like being told what they do, believe, feel and so forth, are morally wrong, by society and its institutions as a whole. If they want to believe, that pedophilia or pedastry is simply a "lifestyle choice", or that their inability to succeed in society isn't based on a "racist, white" conspiracy theory, but simply on the basis of better men and women who make up society wanting nothing to do with them, and for good reason.

MLK would want no more to do with these ilk than any white person of some reknown, such as a scientist like Marie Curie or Issac Newton would want to do with the KKK merely by the misfortune of having shared genetic ancestry with them.

Perhaps changing your behaviors, beliefs, lifestyles, and so forth is the better option, then you won't rightfully have to fear "fascism", "the law", or "society", in the sense of the meritocratic, thinking men and women who comprise most of it that has any lasting value or merit having to object to you, tell you "what to do" when you should be doing it own your own, and so forth. Nor will you have to appeal to your naïve faith in "the Constitution", not even knowing what your own "rights", "freeze peach", and so forth are to begin with, as per thinkers on the subject such as Supreme Court Justice Scalia, per Originalism who argues that it doesn't technically give you a right to utter "fighting words", including on the internet.

You fear that reality and the whole world is against you, because you are against reality and the whole world, it merely having a "conservative, Christian, or white" bias, depending on your flavor of conspiracy theory, or other archaic notions, ideas, dishonesties, or sentiments, from which you derive said silly things to begin with.

Excellent post!

 

[Vrenn]

I believe, that, in some cases, it isn't really "fascism", nor "oppression" which those on the left fear, so much as the reality of their immoral behaviors, views, lifestyles, and so forth.

And that's it's not really a case of fascism, so much as just a wake-up call from reality, it itself having a "fascist bias" to those on the left.

Tell me, have you ever been to a Fascist Controlled Country? I have. You know, a place where the Gendarmes (police) have absolute control over the population. They can kill any they wish to at any time and they aren't held accountable by the Citizens because the Citizens are so terrified to speak up lest they will be beaten, raped, killed etc.. And the entire civilian populace are under a curfew and if you are out past the 10pm curfew by only two minutes reaching for your door latch to enter your home, you can be beaten bloody. Welcome to Spain under the very long rule of Franco all the way into the 1970s. Spain is now a Democratic Republic like most of western Europe and like we are supposed to be. What ended the Franco Fascism? It had to wait until Franco died.

 

[buckeye45_73]

ColonelAngus

Fascism is hard right conservative.. look at the Fascists of the 20th century.

I love the hard right. What makes fascism right wing? It's giant gov, that's left wing.

 

[Ringo]

I love the hard right. What makes fascism right wing? It's giant gov, that's left wing.

There have been many states in history with strong government power, the Chinese Empire, the Kingdom of Louis 14, etc. etc. They were not fascist.
A strong government is far from the main defining feature of a fascist state. Fascism is capitalism on steroids, without any democratic cover.
It is capitalism that uses nationalism and racism to replace democracy, to pit one part of the people against another, trying to replace the class struggle with the feud of nations and races.
And if fascism is capitalism, its main feature, like any capitalist state, is private ownership of the means of production. Who owns the land and industry. If they are in private hands, it is capitalism or fascism.
If they are in collective ownership and exploitation of a person using ownership of means of production is prohibited.
Socialism can be also easily separated from fascism by the fact that in fascist ideology there will never be internationalism and equality of all people before the law and in relation to the means of production. Fascism is always nationalism and racism.

 

[boilermaker55]

So you know that there is always someone . even your beloved P01135809, uses the techniques used in the 1930's , here is a little hint for you George Lincoln Rockwell
Take a look at a previous maga-turd like individual.

I believe, that, in some cases, it isn't really "fascism", nor "oppression" which those on the left fear, so much as the reality of their immoral behaviors, views, lifestyles, and so forth.

And that's it's not really a case of fascism, so much as just a wake-up call from reality, it itself having a "fascist bias" to those on the left.

A left-wing degenerate, for example, may simply not like the idea of being told that pedophilia is wrong or evil, not merely just "socially unaccepted", that elements of society are naturally hierarchical, and that much of their misery Is self-created, as a result of their own immoral worldviews, miseducation, misinformation, and lifestyles, rather than a conspiracy theory invented by "rich cis white heterosexual male Christian capitalist NWO elites" designed to oppress them, publicly and privately, merely a case of society naturally rewarding moral, thinking men and women at the rightful expense of less moral and competent ones.

In the same vein, one of a degenerate, 6th grade education, to whom their favorite progressive blog or media network, marketed to those who's intelligence and education stunted at those levels, designed to exploit them by preying on their immorality, vices, and sociopathic lust for a since of victimhood.

They may be adverse, for example, to being taught that not being a fatuous consumer of degenerate mass media isn't an equal or better "lifestyle choice", than being a man or woman of some morality, character, and merit, such as one who is entrepreneurially minded, and more concerned with helping others is some mature, adult and sincere way (whether based on our Common Law's notion and concept of intentions, or so forth), requiring much in the way of personal development and sacrifice, as is the case of mature men and women, presently and historically who have stood the test of time, and manifested themselves as inspiring role models in whatever their endeavor of choice, from sports, to sciences, to arts, to business.

They might also simply be adverse to having to be told that indoctrinating their children into a worthless worldview, such as nihilistic atheism, progressivism, or materialism isn't just an "alternative lifestyle choice", but is morally and ethically wrong, immature, and ultimately worthless, easily debunkable, and deconstruct able, along with the false faiths, lies, misinformation, conflations, or other silly axioms upon which it is founded on or predicated on to begin with.

Instead having an aversion to society and its institutions, such as the Common Law system, founded on principles, including "religious" ones, such as respect for other people, their families, their property rights, their personal autonomy, and so forth - objecting instead to the notion of this religious morality, and the thinking men and women behind it, such as Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendall Holmes, who helped to founded it and ensure it's perpetuation.

The very notion of law or morality of any sort being imposed upon them, when in reality that is the function of the law and those who make it, to impose it on those who have none, and refuse to do it themselves, living only for the satiation of primitive impulses, self-invented myths and fabrications to justify their immoral sentiments and worthless life pursuits, and drives, such as revenge - which the very law itself was intended to subordinate and take precedence over - much as the very notion of other institutions which they attribute to their sociopathic victimhood and persecutory conspiracies, whether families, traditions, healthy marriages, culture and civilization itself, even maybe the very English language.

Ultimately, what I believe they fear are just well-adjusted normal people, or any civilization of any lasting merit, and those of whom have been any lasting merit to them, from Mill to Kirk, would thankfully have no use for them, given that objections, say to the notion that pedophilia is morally reprehensible, not merely "socially unaccepted", or that genetics, psychology such as the evolutionary psychology of Steven Pinker and others, medicine, and biology indicate that sex and gender have innate origins, with most growing out of various "confusions" upon social maturation past adolescence, not requiring genital removal, nor being part of a "religious" conspiracy theory, just something universally observable enough that all sources, whether erroneously described as "religious" or "secular" have been able to make some measure of observations upon it, nor any childish myths of "trans people" having existed, or held any "sacred status" in ancient cultures only to be "repressed" as part of the conspiracy. or whatever silly little myths the cult members in question might like to content themselves with.

Ultimately, it isn't "fascism" that they fear; sure, fascists would object to this, but so would most well-adjusted normal people of some character, merit or decency - much as how a Communist might insincerely decry "greed" in a general sense (except for his own private property, in the case of the typical "bourgeoise" communist), but Jesus doing so does not make him a communist, nor does it mean he wants to "abolish private property".

So no, ultimately many or most of the conspiracists in question do not really fear "fascism", they simply don't like being told what they do, believe, feel and so forth, are morally wrong, by society and its institutions as a whole. If they want to believe, that pedophilia or pedastry is simply a "lifestyle choice", or that their inability to succeed in society isn't based on a "racist, white" conspiracy theory, but simply on the basis of better men and women who make up society wanting nothing to do with them, and for good reason.

MLK would want no more to do with these ilk than any white person of some reknown, such as a scientist like Marie Curie or Issac Newton would want to do with the KKK merely by the misfortune of having shared genetic ancestry with them.

Perhaps changing your behaviors, beliefs, lifestyles, and so forth is the better option, then you won't rightfully have to fear "fascism", "the law", or "society", in the sense of the meritocratic, thinking men and women who comprise most of it that has any lasting value or merit having to object to you, tell you "what to do" when you should be doing it own your own, and so forth. Nor will you have to appeal to your naïve faith in "the Constitution", not even knowing what your own "rights", "freeze peach", and so forth are to begin with, as per thinkers on the subject such as Supreme Court Justice Scalia, per Originalism who argues that it doesn't technically give you a right to utter "fighting words", including on the internet.

You fear that reality and the whole world is against you, because you are against reality and the whole world, it merely having a "conservative, Christian, or white" bias, depending on your flavor of conspiracy theory, or other archaic notions, ideas, dishonesties, or sentiments, from which you derive said silly things to begin with.