Damning testimony in Trump Hush Money Trial

Chilliconcrappe’s silly post can’t be quoted in the usual manner.

This will suffice:

CALL: "You’re a dolt. Of course the grand jury handed UP an indictment."

RESPONSE: "You are probably upset because the sexual abuser/business fraud is not above the law, and when a grand jury recommends prosecution based upon substantive evidence and sworn testimony, indictments are issued. That how it works in the United States of America."

Shitlips’ reply was to another post.
To the extent the dishonest chilliconcrappe is trying to use Shitlips’ response as a reply to me, it is of course both dishonest and a non sequitur.

What else is new?
 
If you prejudice and paranoia causes you to believe that a jury is not capable of recognizing what a crime is, I'm not surprised that you express contempt for American jurisprudence.
What I believe juries are capable of isn't the issue here.
 
We know.
The Grand Jury beat them to that.
They decided.
Bragg heeded the Grand Jury' decision.....and brought charges.
As American jurisprudence is intended to work.
USA! USA! God Bless America!
They decided wrongly and corruptly. This trial is exactly the opposite of how American jurisprudence is intended to work
 
You're going to go nuts when Trump is convicted.
nope ... until recent events and the Cohen meltdown I expected him to be convicted by the leftwing Stalinista,s ... but now there's a very good chance of a hung jury if 2 or 3 jurors refuse to go along with the dem cult ..
 

Forum List

Back
Top